WordPress powers just over 25% of the world’s websites. That’s not too terribly surprising; is a flexible content management system (CMS) that can power anything from a blog to a company website, including those with e-commerce components. In fact, this very website runs on WordPress, as does. I’ve used it for years to manage these projects, websites for freelance clients, and more. Over the years, WordPress’ backend has become much easier to use. I can log in to my website from any browser in the world to publish new articles, add content to pages, and upload media to share.

• Erlang Example Code
• Free Erlang Calculator

However, I’m a Mac user through and through. I spend most of my workday in front of a 27-inch iMac with Retina 5K display, and would rather use a rich, native macOS app than a web app any day of the week. Thankfully, there are several WordPress clients for the Mac. These apps allow me to write and publish articles directly from macOS without the need to fire up a browser.

These applications won’t surface things like WordPress’ widget or menu settings, but should make publishing new content as frictionless as possible. Get Back Hours Per Week Discover how to improve your workflows and get more focus with this free, in-depth guide to productivity. Things to Consider In looking at which WordPress client is the best, there are several criteria to review:. Design – A good WordPress client for the Mac should be a good Mac app. It should be fast, stable, and conform to system norms found in other macOS applications. Flexibility – WordPress can be configured in a bunch of different ways, and a WordPress client should be able to adapt to different installations easily.

Price – I’m not super concerned with price for this review. I’m willing to pay for an application I will use numerous times a day. In fact, I’d rather pay for something I depend on than have it disappear or fall out of date because the developer can’t afford to keep it going. A Quick Sidebar The universe of WordPress can be broken into two main worlds:.

This is the free, open-source software that you can install on your own server. It’s often referred to as “self-hosted” WordPress, and it’s what The Sweet Setup and many other independent websites use. This is what is called “hosted” WordPress.

This is more akin to something like Squarespace or Tumblr, where your website and all of its content are hosted by the company that made the platform. While the self-hosted WordPress software is free, a WordPress.com website can be. Different WordPress clients treat these two worlds differently, and that will be noted throughout the rest of the review. Our pick: MarsEdit is a name that has been around the Mac world for a long time. Originally part of, the application has been part of Red Sweater Software for many years. MarsEdit supports numerous blogging platforms beyond WordPress, including and We’ll be focusing on the first, but its ability to work with different content management systems is impressive. Setup Getting started with MarsEdit and WordPress is simple.

Hemoglobin is a molecule located in your red blood cells that is responsible for holding oxygen. The A1c is simply a specific subtype of hemoglobin A. It stands for Hemoglobin A1-c. Mas abbreviation stands for mac. HbA1c is formed when glucose (a blood sugar) binds to the hemoglobin.

At first launch, the application will prompt you to log in with your blog’s credentials. For WordPress, this is the same user name and password you use to log in to your website on the web. (You will be asked to provide the URL of your website, too.) This login information is stored securely in your Mac’s keychain, and is never synced to another device or server.

If you don’t yet have a WordPress site, MarsEdit can direct you to setting up a WordPress.com account. Once logged in, you will be presented with a list of your most recent blog posts: If this looks familiar, it should. MarsEdit’s user interface isn’t all that unlike macOS’ built-in Mail application.

That’s a plus in our book. Creating a New Post Posting a new blog post in MarsEdit is as simple as composing an email. Clicking New Post from the app’s toolbar will bring up the post editor: Note: MarsEdit allows for rich text editing, like Mail. If you use bold text in the editor, the text will be bold on your website and so on. However, the application will also take HTML text if you prefer to write in HTML or as I do.

When you start your first new post, you will be asked which the program should use. In the main section of the window, you’ll enter the post’s headline, any tags you wish to use, and then of course, the content.

You can write directly within MarsEdit, or paste content in from an external editor, Down the right side of the window, you’ll see your blog’s categories. These are fetched from your website, and if you opt to create a new category within MarsEdit, it will be added to your blog automatically. Under the category list, you can set several other parameters for your post:. Featured Image: If your blog’s theme supports it, you can add this image here directly via drag-and-drop.

Post status: Draft, Private, Published. Author: Select a writer for your post, if your site supports multiple authors. Comments: None, Open or Closed. If you have comments visible on your blog, it’s important to select the correct option. TrackBacks: This notifies other WordPress sites that you have linked to them within your post.

Once you have your content in, you can preview the post by clicking the Preview toolbar item. To add a photo to a post, click Media in the toolbar, and MarsEdit’s Media Manager will open. Here, you can select images from your Mac’s hard drive to upload with your new post: Once your desired image is selected, you can tell MarsEdit how to style it (left-align, right-align, etc), and you can change the file name and Alt. Text as desired. Additionally, you can set the size of the image. You can set the width, and the height will be automatically set. If you select Treat as Retina image, MarsEdit will halve the size of the image, as explained If you want a 400×400 image on your blog to look nice on Retina displays, just supply an image at least 800×800 and check the Treat as Retina image checkbox.

MarsEdit will produce the expected HTML and upload the image at twice the width and height. Once everything is just right, publishing to your WordPress site is as simple as pressing Send to Blog. Alternatively, a post can be saved as a local draft for completion later. Editing an Existing Post Editing an existing post is also simple. Clicking on a post will preview it in the main window; double-clicking will open it in its own window.

Once the editor opens, you can change any text and hit Send to Blog for your changes to be applied to the web. Advanced Options Out of the box, MarsEdit will work nicely with most WordPress installations, but if you’ve customized your blog, the program can be adapted to just about anything.

To see your blog’s settings, right-click on its name in the main window, and a new pop-up will open. I won’t walk through all of the possible setting here, but I think a few are worth mentioning: In the Editing tab, I’ve told MarsEdit to use Markdown when rendering the post preview. Since I write and publish in Markdown, this assures me that I haven’t missed an asterisk or a line break somewhere. For a while, I was publishing posts, having forgotten to set a category. In the Posting tab, I’ve now told MarsEdit to warn me if I try to post without a category selected. On 512 Pixels, I use a custom field to link to an external source from my post’s headline.

To make this work, I have a custom WordPress plugin that looks for a URL in the “linkedlisturl” field. This is just a little bit of metadata, and MarsEdit can let me add it directly from its new post interface. Pricing MarsEdit for $49.95.

The developer also sells the application and offers a free 30-day trial. It requires macOS Sierra or later. The Runners-Up While MarsEdit has been around a long time, it is not the only WordPress client for the Mac. Blogo Blogo offers not only but A monthly subscription of $6.99. Support for multiple blogs.

Media search. Ability to reply to comments from the app. Syncing drafts with Evernote. Support for custom fields. Audience Booster, which will copy your content to Medium Blogo is laid out well with posts and pages in a single, filterable column, a main content window, and then publishing settings: As it has an iOS app, it’s easy to think about Blogo as an entire blogging system above or around WordPress. As polished as the user interface is, I find its lack of fine-grained settings frustrating.

MarsEdit’s settings panel may be overwhelming to some, but if you’re publishing to a blog, those options are important. Desk can be used with self-hosted WordPress accounts as long as you also have a free WordPress.com account set up and associated with it. If you use the popular plugin installed, you’re already good to go. While the app’s interface is certainly more modern looking than MarsEdit’s, I find it to be much more confusing. Instead of taking a Mail-like approach, Desk wants to create a separate document for each individual post.

Once a new document has been created, it is added to the main timeline, along with other published posts: (I’d much prefer my drafts and published articles be separated.) To publish a new post, click the export arrow in the upper-right corner. A new panel slides in, offering several posting options. Unlike MarsEdit, Desk doesn’t offer much in the way of customization here, and lacks support for advanced features like custom fields. I should note that I had Desk crash repeatedly on my iMac, which was running the most up-to-date version of macOS Sierra.

Desk can be picked up If you want something simple, it does look nice, but it’s not for me. WordPress for Mac WordPress offers a first-party application. And is basically a wrapper around the WordPress.com website. If you’re using that option, you’ll be all set, as the Mac app offers almost everything present in the online back-end. If you have connected your self-hosted WordPress site to the company’s service, then you’ll be able to access your site here as well. If your WordPress site is close to stock, this is a nice way to publish and edit posts and pages, see site traffic, manage users and plugins, and more. If you rely on more advanced options like custom fields, this app isn’t really an option.

In Closing If you’re like me and would rather use a desktop application than a web app to manage your WordPress site, is the best route. It’s full of features, easy to use, and feels right at home on macOS.

Difference Between Haskell vs Erlang Haskell is a standard functional programming language, which is modular and general-purpose in nature. This language got its name after Haskell Brooks Curry, a mathematician, and logician. Haskell revolves around the concept of functions, which are a block of code aim to perform specific tasks.

Functions are being called only when required. Functions are also treated as values i.e. Two functions can be added just like normal integers. This makes the Haskell a purely functional programming language. Two important aspects of Haskell is its non-strict semantics and strong static typing. With Haskell, strong data typing is merged with polymorphism concept, means a developer can write a single function which would sort integers as well as strings. This is unlike other languages, where the developer must write down two separate functions for two different data types.

Erlang Example Code

Just like Haskell, Erlang also falls into the category of a functional programming language, which is concurrent and general-purpose in nature. Just like any other functional language, it focuses on expression evaluation, rather than command execution, where expressions utilize functions to deduce basic values. Although being functional, it is like a virtual machine and has. Java community chiefly focuses on Web development ecosystem, whereas Erlang has its stronghold on an embedded system and robust servers. Indeed, Erlang is of robust system programs, working on distributed computers in a network. Erlang is freely available as open source code and being taught worldwide in universities. Haskell got its first stable release in July 2010.

It promotes a type system with an interesting aspect called “lazy-evaluation”, with which one function’s result can be handed over to another function, a function taking another function as an argument or return it, as a result, are qualified as higher-order functions. Another interesting feature is termed as monads, an assembly line like structure, a different task is performed at every stop on the line. Because of this feature, any side effect can be categorized as a separate activity excluding any function. Erlang draws its similarity with Java, for providing garbage collection, developers need not worry about allocated memory space return issues.

System component can be efficiently developed with dynamic type feature of Erlang, these components need not care about the data type they are going to deal with. An Erlang program can be distributed quite easily and can be made to run at any node in a network, making Erlang quite efficient for building system components. Erlang language also provides interfaces for Java, C, C, hence can be implemented with ease. Being a concurrent one, its thread supervision comes in useful for state machines and event distribution. On every platform, Erlang’s bytecode can be identified.

It can prove to be a better option when it comes to any concurrent activity, fault tolerance, real-time response, features which are required to maintain a healthy backend system. For a network system having an HTTP server, a protocol like SNMP, it includes all component, thus making Erlang a preferred choice for a network and distributed system. Its actor-based model makes it is precisely good enough for the distributed system. Head To Head Comparisons Between Haskell vs Erlang (Infographics) Below is the top 6 difference between Haskell vs Erlang Key Differences between Haskell vs Erlang Both Haskell vs Erlang are popular choices in the market; let us discuss some of the major Difference Between Haskell vs Erlang.

Haskell is strongly statically typed functional programming language whereas Erlang is dynamically typed functional programming language. Haskell has a more abstract concept with association toward academic and mathematics whereas Erlang is more pragmatic in nature and can be preferred to use on a production system.

Haskell is a traditional and general-purpose language, with its pure functional aspect whereas Erlang is more suited for the distributed environment, does prominently in developing distributed applications, having a feature like a fault tolerance. Haskell is a purely functional programming language and does not gel with rest of the paradigms whereas Erlang is a hybrid, and dynamically type functional language, based on bytecode concept.

Haskell is a traditional and academic in nature, not pragmatic in nature whereas Erlang with its roots in the telecom industry has dedicated support for designing a distributed system. Haskell has more concise syntax, better suited for traditional programming competitions whereas Erlang is successful, but its syntax is not easy to get on with.

Free Erlang Calculator

Haskell does not have brilliance when it comes to concurrency whereas Erlang is suitable for the concurrency-based system. Haskell, although elegant and academic, not so popular on production system whereas Erlang with its pragmatic approach is popular on a production system. Haskell, being a traditional programming language, is designed to run on a single node whereas Erlang having its wonderful concurrency support, can run efficiently on a distributed system with multiple nodes. Haskell with lambdas and recursive definitions can abstract and formalize the semantics efficiently whereas Erlang, is mediocre outside it niche i.e.

Distributed system, not at the same level of expressiveness as Haskell. Haskell vs Erlang Comparison Table Here are some of the Comparison between Haskell vs Erlang – Performance Parameter Haskell Erlang Paradigm Strongly statically typed functional programming Dynamically typed functional programming Nature Traditional & general purpose in nature Distributed based on run-time actor system model Expressive Awesome ability to abstract invariants and semantics It does average outside it niche i.e. Distributed system Distributed system Perform mediocrely, rediscover from the scratch Awesome support for a distributed system Category Academic, mathematic oriented Practical and pragmatic Learning curve A steep learning curve, with an abstract mathematics concept Easy to get into albeit seems strange at first glance Conclusion – Haskell vs Erlang Erlang vs Haskell, both have their own set of merits and demerits. Haskell is more traditional, purely functional programming language, falls into an academic-zone, having more abstract concepts. Its syntax is concise but at the same time, its learning curve can be steep.

It has several features like lambdas, recursive definitions, which can help abstract and formalize the semantics efficiently. However, for a production like a system, Haskell is the less preferred choice as compare to Erlang. Erlang has an amazing support for features like fault tolerance, and concurrency. These two features need to be handled efficiently for a successful distributed system. Erlang thus fares far better in designing the distributed system, based on actor model. Both, Erlang vs Haskell, have their own specific use-cases.

In their specific zones, they perform efficiently. When it comes to developing a traditional system having a single node, Haskell would win over with its abstract and concise syntax like features. Erlang, on the other hand, is a perfect fit for developing a distributed system having multiple nodes, since its support for concurrency, network-based components, and fault tolerance meet all the requirement. At the end of the day, it’s the scenario and use-case which would decide the usage of language. Recommended Articles This has a been a guide to the top difference between Haskell vs Erlang. Here we also discuss the Haskell vs Erlang key differences with infographics, and comparison table. You may also have a look at the following articles to learn more –.